Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 87 Wis. 2d 209 - State v. Streich

87 Wis. 2d 209 - State v. Streich’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
July 2005
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 2005

16 state decisions

1001979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Neil v. Biggers · Stovall v. Denno · Manson v. Brathwaite · 62 Wis. 2d 730 - State v. Stanislawski · 80 Wis. 2d 122 - State v. Mendoza

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““That the district attorney, defendant and his counsel all sign a written stipulation providing for defendant’s submission to the test and for the subsequent admission at trial of the graphs, and the examiner’s opinion on behalf of either defendant or the state.” Stanislawski, 62 Wis.2d at 742 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “under the 'totality of the circumstances' the identification was reliable even though the confrontation procedure was suggestive.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'the admission of evidence of a showup without more does not violate due process.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.