Marx v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs’s Empirical Analysis
870 F.2d 114 · 1989
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2005
11 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 30 U.S.C. § 921 · 30 U.S.C. § 932 · 33 U.S.C. § 921
Relies on Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Rowe · Gober v. Matthews · Kertesz v. Crescent Hills Coal Co. · Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Mangifest · 6 O.S.H. Cas.(bna) 1440, 1978 O.S.H.D. (Cch) P 22,628 Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Ajpplying the [new] rule ... does not result in manifest injustice if petitioner has the opportunity to present proof that the miner’s lung cancer constituted chronic lung disease and suggests a reasonable possibility that death was due to pneumoconiosis. The Board concluded that claimant did not meet this requirement because the miner’s lung cancer was not described as chronic. As petitioner points out, there was no reason for her to provide testimony on this issue [given] the law at the time of the hearing.... Accordingly, a remand to the AU is necessary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“We review the Board's decision to determine whether it committed an error of law and whether it adhered to its scope of review. In performing the latter function, 'we must independently review the record”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.