Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 870 F.2d 276 - Kirkpatrick v. Butler

Kirkpatrick v. Butler’s Empirical Analysis

870 F.2d 276 · 1989

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2015 · most notably 768 So. 2d 542 - State v. Hoffman (2000), United States v. Gould (2004)

15 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

1901989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Glasser v. United States · Aguilar v. Texas · Chimel v. California · Payton v. New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Despite the police’s belief in the likelihood that a confederate of an arrested individual may almost always be in the arrestee’s apartment, the police must articulate reasonable grounds for believing that the suspected accomplice is indeed there. An unsubstantiated belief that confederates may gather in a single apartment does not suffice to permit the police to search an apartment that they would otherwise lack a valid basis to search.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “have reasonable grounds to believe that there are other persons present inside who might present a security risk.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.