Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 870 F.2d 409 - McCalpine v. Foertsch

McCalpine v. Foertsch’s Empirical Analysis

870 F.2d 409 · 1989

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
March 2002
most recently cited

11 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2002

11 federal appellate ·

110198919902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866)

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · La Montagne v. American Convenience Products, Inc. · Collins v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hether there is substantial evidence to support the jury’s verdict. Specifically, ... whether the evidence presented, combined with all reasonable inferences that can be drawn from it, is sufficient to support the verdict when viewed in the light most favorable to the party winning it. La Montagne v. American Convenience Prods., Inc., 750 F.2d 1405, 1410 (7th Cir.1984). Any conflicts in the evidence must be resolved in favor of the party winning the verdict. Id. [The district court does] not judge the credibility of the witnesses. Freeman v. Franzen, 695 F.2d 485, 489 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1214 , 103 S.Ct. 3553 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1400 (1983). While the [district court does] not reweigh the evidence as a jury would, [it does] “weigh the evidence to the extent of determining whether the evidence to support the verdict is substantial; a mere scintilla of evidence will not suffice.” La Montagne, 750 F.2d at 1410 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.