Jelinek v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis
870 F.2d 457 · 1989
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently September 2014
7 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gavin v. Heckler · Tucker v. Heckler · Jelinek v. Heckler · Clarke v. Bowen · Douglas v. Bowen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that [a] claimant may do light work does not rule out a finding that [the] claimant is disabled to the extent that [s]he cannot undertake substantial gainful activity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“may not substitute [our] judgment for that of the Secretary simply because [we] might disagree or find[ ] the claimant's proof more credible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brockman v. Sullivan“is to determine whether jobs exist for someone with the claimant's precise disabilities.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Montgomery v. Chater
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.