Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 870 F.2d 613 - United States v. Downs

United States v. Downs’s Empirical Analysis

870 F.2d 613 · 1989

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
May 2013
most recently cited

17 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently May 2013 · most notably Pelletier v. Zweifel (1991), United States v. Frost (1997)

17 federal appellate ·

2101989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002)

Relies on Bonner v. City of Prichard · Pereira v. United States · Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Stein v. Reynolds Securities, Inc. · Alimeg, Inc. v. Shlim

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) an intentional participation in a scheme to defraud a person of money or property, and (2) the use of the mails in furtherance of the scheme.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.