Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

870 F.2d 655

Docket No. 88-7845.

Lett v. Dolinger

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Jan. 30, 1989. Decided March 6, 1989.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1989-03-06

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Whisenant v. Yuam · Kelvin J. Miles v. Audrey E. Melbourne, Judge, Seventh Judicial Circuit of Maryland, Respondent

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1989-03-06

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Troussant Delano Lett, appellant pro se.

Dana B. Sykes, Hirschler, Fleischer, Weinberg, Cox & Allen), for appellees.

Before K.K. HALL and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Troussant Delano Lett appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm* on the reasoning of the district court. Lett v. Dolinger, C/A No. 88-419-R (E.D.Va. Dec. 13, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

*

We deny Lett's motion for the appointment of counsel in light of our view of the issue presented. See Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 160 (4th Cir.1984)

/870/f2d/655 · .json · Public domain