Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 870 F.2d 786 - Shea v. Tisch

Shea v. Tisch’s Empirical Analysis

870 F.2d 786 · 1989

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
April 2002
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2002 · most notably US Airways, Inc. v. Barnett (2002), Bates v. Long Island Railroad (1993)

27 federal appellate · 5 district ·

410198919902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on School Board of Nassau County Florida v. H Arline · Harris v. McRae · United States ex rel. Eichenlaub v. Shaughnessy · Goldman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. · Carter v. Tisch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Consequently, we ... conclude that the postal service was not required to accommodate plaintiff further by placing him in a different position since to do so would violate the rights of other employees under the collective bargaining agreement.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “would not defeat the provisions of a collective bargaining agreement unless it could be shown that the agreement had the effect or the intent of discrimination”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “an employer is not required to find alternative employment unless he normally does so under his existing policies”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.