First Data Corp. v. Inselberg’s Empirical Analysis
870 F.3d 1367 · 2017
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1338 · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Relies on Bell v. Hood · Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp. · Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. · Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co. · Texas v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“of recovering title to the patents at issue. That, in turn required a court to invalidate an assignment agreement, and only if that case were successful could the patent claims no longer be contingent on a future event that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“may not occur as anticipated, or indeed may not occur at all”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.