White v. Sunoco, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
870 F.3d 257 · 2017
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 9 U.S.C. § 16 (Federal Arbitration Act)
Relies on Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co. · Volt Information Sciences Inc v. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University · Jarecki v. G. D. Searle & Co. · Arthur Andersen LLP v. Carlisle · MS Dealer Service Corp. v. Franklin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a motion to compel arbitration should only be granted if there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and, after viewing facts and drawing inferences in favor of the non-moving party, the party moving to compel is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“is essentially the same as the test described in DuPont .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“should avoid the choice-of-law question.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.