Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 870 F.3d 939 - Updike v. Multnomah County

Updike v. Multnomah County’s Empirical Analysis

870 F.3d 939 · 2017

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
March 2025
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently March 2025

1 federal appellate ·

7020172020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12131 (§ 201 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A. · City of Los Angeles v. Lyons · O'Shea v. Littleton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “furnish[ing] appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in, and enjoy the benefits of, a service, program, or activity conducted by a public entity,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]t is well-settled that Title II ... create[s] a duty to gather sufficient information from the [disabled individual] and qualified experts as needed to determine what accommodations are necessary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “was either excluded from participation in or denied the benefits of a public entity's services, programs, or activities, or was otherwise discriminated against by the public entity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.