Adkins v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2009
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Sandstrom v. Montana · Rose v. Clark · 126 S. Ct. 2916 - Credit Suisse First Boston Ltd. v. Billing · Dill v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the state failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt any of the elements of pointing a firearm, then you must find the defendant not guilty of pointing a firearm. If the State did prove beyond a reasonable doubt all of these elements, then, and only then, may you find the defendant guilty of pointing a firearm. However, if the State proved [all] of the elements of pointing a firearm, but the defendant proved by a preponderance of the evidence that the firearm was unloaded, then, and only then, may you find the defendant guilty of pointing an unloaded firearm. To prove a proposition by a preponderance of the evidence, a party must convince you that the proposition is more likely true than not true.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Adkins v. State“with respect to which the defendant bears the burden of proof. This is also the approach followed by the Indiana Pattern Jury Instructions. The second school of thought is that advanced by Judge Crone in his separate opinion in this case. Judge Crone took the position that it is not an affirmative defense to demonstrate that a firearm is unloaded. Adkins, id. at 473 (Crone, J., concurring in result).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Harrison v. State“A person who knowingly or intentionally points a firearm at another person commits a Class D felony. However, the offense is a Class A misdemeanor if the firearm was not loaded.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Harrison v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.