Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 870 P2D 349 - Brenning v. State

Brenning v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2011
most recently cited

1 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 2011

1 district · 4 state decisions

20199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pickens v. Lockheed Corp. · Duffy v. State · Murray v. State · BHP Petroleum Co., Inc. v. State · BHP PETROLEUM CO. INC. v. State, Wyoming Tax Com'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In addition to any other punishment prescribed by law the court shall, upon conviction for any misdemeanor or felony, order a defendant to pay restitution to each victim as determined under W.S. 7-9-103 and 7-9-114 unless the court specifically finds that the defendant has no ability to pay and that no reasonable probability exists that the defendant will have an ability to pay.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[The court must make a specific finding only when the defendant does not have a present or prospective ability to pay. Although the court is not required to specifically find that a defendant has the ability to pay, the record must still contain evidence to support the existence of a present or future ability to pay.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.