Curtis v. State

Franklin CURTIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 27, 2004.

Rehearing Denied March 23, 2004.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2004-02-27

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 2014

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-02-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1DAVIS, Judge.

¶2Franklin Curtis challenges the order denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus. While habeas corpus is not the proper vehicle to address the claims raised by Curtis, they are cognizable in a motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. It is apparent from the trial court's analysis that it treated Curtis' claims as if they were raised in a postconviction motion. Accordingly, finding no error, we affirm without discussion.

¶3Affirmed.

¶4FULMER and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.