Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

870 So. 2d 863

Velazquez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 4, 2004

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2004-02-04

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2011

1 state decisions

Relies on 722 So. 2d 905 - Garcia v. State · 697 So. 2d 944 - State v. Frazier

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-02-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

¶2Upon the State’s proper confession of error that Velazquez’s restitution should be reduced from $ 1,860 to $1,828 to conform to the terms of Velazquez’s plea agreement, we remand with instructions to reduce restitution accordingly. See Garcia v. State, 722 So.2d 905, 907 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (“A plea agreement is a contract and the rules of contract law apply to plea agreements.”); State v. Frazier, 697 So.2d 944, 945 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (“[T]he state, above all parties, must keep its word.”). We otherwise affirm the order revoking and modifying the terms of Velazquez’s probation.

¶3*864Affirmed in part, remanded with instructions.

/870/so2d/863 · .json · Public domain