¶1Affirmed. See Ragsdale v. State, 720 So.2d 203 (Fla.1998); Evans v. State, 795 So.2d 275 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Williams v. State, 689 So.2d 393 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), review denied, 697 So.2d 513 (Fla.1997); Kopel v. Kopel, 832 So.2d 108 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)(Schwartz, C.J., specially concurring), review denied, 848 So.2d 1154 (Fla.2003).
870 So. 2d 917
R.M. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 21, 2004
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2004-04-21
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 2004
1 state decisions
Relies on 697 So. 2d 504 - Amendments to Rules of Judicial Administration · 720 So. 2d 203 - Ragsdale v. State · 848 So. 2d 1069 - Amendments to the Florida Probate Rules
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2004-04-21
View the full empirical analysis of this case →