Mayes v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 2014
2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Batson v. Kentucky · Rhode Island v. Innis · Powers v. Ohio · Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“because of the State's inaction, qualified African-American venirepersons were strategically prevented from serving on the ultimate jury panel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Lucero“not prepared to hold that [a defendant] may sustain a Batson challenge by proof of the State's non-use of peremptory challenges.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Lucero
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.