Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 870 SW2D 786 - Hayes v. Commonwealth

Hayes v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
September 2013
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently September 2013

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

40199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morgan v. Commonwealth · Evitts v. Commonwealth · Commonwealth v. Rose · Baker v. Commonwealth · Cottrell v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In this situation, under the totality of the circumstances, an argument can be made that the deceased was involved in the robbery of Hayes and was acting in complicity with other robbers who shot at Hayes. Whether Hayes was justified to use self-defense which resulted in the killing of the occupant of the car is a jury question. It is the holding of this Court that the question of self-protection against multiple aggressors acting in concert, when supported by sufficient evidence, should be given to the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The jury instructions must be complete and the defendant has a right to have every issue of fact raised by the evidence and material to his defense submitted to the jury on proper instructions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.