Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 871 A2D 930 - State v. Crow

State v. Crow’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Banach · State v. Mattatall · State v. Grayhurst · State v. Breen · Wells v. Uvex Winter Optical, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The requirement in Rule 30 that the objection to an instruction be made before the jury retires (and that it be made with clarity and specificity) is crucial because, once alerted to the perceived error in the instruction that has been given, the trial justice has an opportunity to cure the alleged deficiencies before the jury retires for deliberations.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.