Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 871 F.2d 1427 - Kim v. Fujikawa

Kim v. Fujikawa’s Empirical Analysis

871 F.2d 1427 · 1989

Citation profile

92
cited by 92 later decisions
April 2019
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 10 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 92 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Davis v. City and County San Francisco (1992), Martin v. Feilen (1992)

28 federal appellate · 10 district ·

4501989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1001 (§ 2 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1002 (§ 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1104 (§ 404 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1106 (§ 406 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1109 (§ 409 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (§ 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Allen v. McCurry · Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Russell · Hormel v. Helvering · Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'is a member of the class [e.g., fiduciaries] whose activities Congress intended to regulate for the protection and benefit of an entirely distinct class [e.g., ERISA plans],'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"[a]ny person who is a fiduciary with respect to a plan who breaches any of the responsibilities, obligations, or duties imposed upon fiduciaries by this subchapter shall be personally liable to make good to such plan any losses to the plan resulting from each such breach ... and shall be subject to such other equitable or remedial relief as the court may deem appropriate, including removal of such fiduciary....” 29 U.S.C. § 1109 (a).”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “At any time after commencement of the action a defending party, as a third-party plaintiff, may cause a summons and complaint to be served upon a person not a party to the action who is or may be liable to the third-party plaintiff....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.