Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 871 F.2d 545 - Moore v. Mississippi Valley State University

Moore v. Mississippi Valley State University’s Empirical Analysis

871 F.2d 545 · 1989

Citation profile

214
cited by 214 later decisions
3
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

87 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 214 later decisions — most recently August 2016 · most notably Washington v. Allstate Insurance (1990), Jones v. Roadway Express, Inc. (1991)

87 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

14601989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1397 (§ 2001 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Connick v. Myers · In re Disbarment of Gonzales · Robnett v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 214 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
    24 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “review the facts drawing all inferences most favorable to the party opposing the motion.”
    21 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““[w]hen a motion for summary judgment is made and supported as provided in this rule, an adverse party may not rest upon the mere allegations or denials of the adverse party’s pleading, but ... must set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.””
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.