Lucien v. Spencer’s Empirical Analysis
871 F.3d 117 · 2017
Citation profile
5 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Kotteakos v. United States · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Estelle v. McGuire
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Woods v. Medeiros“Like the district court, however, we are required to afford significant deference to the state court's decision under most circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dorisca v. Marchilli“based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Woods v. Medeiros
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.