NFC Technology, LLC v. Matal’s Empirical Analysis
871 F.3d 1367 · 2017
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 35 U.S.C. § 143
Relies on Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Price v. Symsek · Woodland Trust v. Flowertree Nursery, Inc. · Cooper v. Goldfarb · Singh v. Brake
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“At bottom, the goal of the analysis is to determine whether the inventor's story is credible.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Consol. Edison Co. v. NLRB , 305 U.S. 197 , 229, 59 S.Ct. 206 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938) (citations omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.