Laryea v. Sessions’s Empirical Analysis
871 F.3d 337 · 2017
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · 195 L. Ed. 2d 604 - Mathis v. United States · Efe v. Ashcroft · Mikhael v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Wang v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“giv[ing] Chevron deference [ 6 ] to the BIA's interpretation of the term 'moral turpitude' and its guidance on the general categories of offenses which constitute CIMTs.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“has not been convicted of an offense under section 1182(a)(2)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.