Smith v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
871 F.3d 684 · 2017
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2024
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Ratzlaf et Ux United States · Wilkinson Director Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al. v. Dotson et al. · Jimenez v. Quarterman · Magwood v. Patterson · Sharma v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.