Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 871 F. Supp. 110 - Siebert v. Nives

871 F. Supp. 110 - Siebert v. Nives’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
August 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 2018

2 federal appellate · 2 district ·

60199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78A (§ 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78I (§ 9 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78T (§ 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 28 U.S.C. § 1367

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Scheuer v. Rhodes · Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co. · Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. Gilbertson · United Families of America v. Kendrick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It surely cannot be the ease that every annual report which records corporate losses signals some underlying fraud. While decreased profits and increased loan loss reserves may be consistent with fraud in some cases, they are also symptomatic of a variety of non-fraudulent ills, ranging from poor business judgment to unfavorable market conditions..”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the circumstances would suggest to an investor of ordinary intelligence the probability that she has been defrauded.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.