871 F. Supp. 2d 913 - Donohue v. Apple, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 45 (§ 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914)
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP) · 20 Cal. 4th 163 - Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co. · In Re Tobacco II Cases
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) when the defendant is in a fiduciary, relationship with the plaintiff; (2) when the defendant had exclusive knowledge of material facts not known to the plaintiff; (3) when the defendant actively conceals a material fact from the plaintiff; and (4) when the defendant makes partial representations but also suppresses some material fact.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he complaint must identify the specific provision of the contract allegedly breached by the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“all material allegations of the complaint [must be] accepted as true”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.