Archuleta v. Valencia’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 2026
1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kistler v. Halsey · Mince v. Butters · Duke v. Housen · Ball Ex Rel. Ball v. Ball · 30 Colo. App. 284 - Thorpe v. City and County of Denver
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The Court is not free to set aside the verdict merely because the judge might have awarded a different amount of damages, but it may do so if the proceedings have been tainted by appeals to prejudice or if the verdict, in light of the evidence, is so unreasonable that it would be unconscionable to permit it to stand."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dewey v. Wentland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.