¶1As we have held before, the Florida Sexual Predators Act, does not deny procedural due process under the Florida Constitution. White v. State, 866 So.2d 703 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), Reyes v. State, 854 So.2d 816 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), Jones v. State, 855 So.2d 715 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). See also Therrien v. State, 859 So.2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Martin v. State, 864 So.2d 589, 589 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Givens v. State, 851 So.2d 813 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). Accordingly, we affirm the order denying relief. Again, we certify conflict with Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
871 So. 2d 1010
Demick v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 21, 2004
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2004-04-21
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 2013
2 state decisions
Relies on 855 So. 2d 1281 - Espindola v. State · 854 So. 2d 816 - Reyes v. State · 859 So. 2d 585 - Therrien v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2004-04-21
View the full empirical analysis of this case →