871 So. 2d 1040 - Mitchell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 365 So. 2d 1067 - Coxon v. State · Van Wagner v. State · 566 So. 2d 69 - Young v. State · 664 So. 2d 23 - Salzano v. State · 864 So. 2d 512 - Woodson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the sex offender treatment condition only stated that Mitchell needed to complete the program. It did not specify that treatment had to be successfully completed on the first try or how many chances he would be given to complete the program. Accordingly, the State failed to prove that the violation of [the sex offender treatment condition] was willful and substantial, and the trial court abused its discretion in finding that the condition was violated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Adams v. State“we will remand for reconsideration of the revocation order `when a substantial ground for revocation was reversed leaving only proof of the violation of a technical ground to support the revocation'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.