Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 871 So. 2d 1187 - Kops v. Lee

871 So. 2d 1187 - Kops v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2013
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 755 So. 2d 226 - Independent Fire Ins. Co. v. Sunbeam Corp. · Sanders v. Ashland Oil, Inc. · Schwarz v. ADMINISTRATORS TUL. EDUC. FUND · 720 So. 2d 398 - Two Feathers Enterprise v. First Nat. Bank · 346 So. 2d 743 - Acme Refrig. of Baton Rouge, Inc. v. Caljoan, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A. An appellee shall not be obliged to answer the appeal unless he desires to have the judgment modified, revised, or reversed in part or unless he demands damages against the appellant. In such cases, he must file an answer to the appeal, stating the relief demanded, not later than fifteen days after the return day or the lodging of the record whichever is later. The answer filed by the appellee shall be equivalent to an appeal on his part from any portion of the judgment rendered against him in favor of the appellant and of which he complains in his answer. Additionally, however, an appellee may by answer to the appeal, demand modification, revision, or reversal of the judgment insofar as it did not allow or consider relief prayed for by an incidental action filed in the trial court. If an appellee files such an answer, all other parties to the incidental demand may file similar answers within fifteen days of the appellee's action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “there is no genuine issue as to a material fact”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.