Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 872 F.2d 1444 - United States v. Maez

United States v. Maez’s Empirical Analysis

872 F.2d 1444 · 1989

Citation profile

159
cited by 159 later decisions
17
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

81 federal appellate · 32 district · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 159 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably United States v. Sandoval (1994), Sharrar v. Felsing (1997)

81 federal appellate · 32 district · 20 state decisions — followed in 17 states

84019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 2113

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Wong Sun v. United States · Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 159 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the temporal proximity of the illegal detention and the consent, any intervening circumstances, and, particularly, the purpose and flagrancy of the officer's unlawful conduct.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If the consent is not sufficiently an act of free will to purge the primary taint of the illegal detention, . . . it must be suppressed as 'fruit of the poisonous tree.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “as they would have appeared to prudent, cautious, and trained officers.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.