Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 872 F.2d 224 - Williams-El v. Johnson

Williams-El v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

872 F.2d 224 · 1989

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
2
states following
November 2022
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably Andrews v. Fowler (1996), Archuleta v. Colorado Department of Institutions (1991)

22 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

27019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Estelle v. Gamble · Bell v. Wolfish

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Unless the evidence is such that without weighing the credibility of the witnesses there can be but one reasonable conclusion, the motion for directed verdict should be denied.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “proscribes 'certain government actions regardless of the fairness of the procedures used to implement them.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “'reasonable minds could differ as to the importance of the evidence, ... a verdict should not be directed.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.