Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 872 F.2d 287 - Miller v. Sumner

Miller v. Sumner’s Empirical Analysis

872 F.2d 287 · 1989

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
3
states following
May 2010
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently May 2010 · most notably McCalden v. California Library Ass'n (1990), Hostler v. Groves (1990)

29 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

3401989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Houston v. Lack · Rodgers v. Watt · Thompson v. Montgomery · Logan v. Central Freight Lines

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “would encourage prison officials, who often are the appellees in these suits, to delay mailing notices of appeal.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “notices of appeal are deemed filed when they are delivered to prison authorities for forwarding to the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Only then will we have jurisdiction over this appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.