872 F. 2d 427 - Crites v. Pacific First Federal Savings

872 F2d 427 Crites v. Pacific First Federal Savings

872 F.2d 427

Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

In re Raymond Elmer CRITES; In re Barbara Elizabeth Crites,
Debtors.
Raymond Elmer CRITES; Barbara Elizabeth Crites, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
PACIFIC FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 88-3570.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted March 7, 1989.
Decided April 11, 1989.

Before CANBY, DAVID R. THOMPSON and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT ORDER

1

In affirming the bankruptcy court, the district court adopted the factual statement and legal conclusions of what it called the "well-reasoned Memorandum Opinion" of the Honorable Elizabeth L. Perris, United States Bankruptcy Judge, filed July 8, 1987.

2

We affirm the district court and adopt as our memorandum what we also see as the well-reasoned memorandum opinion of Bankruptcy Judge Elizabeth L. Perris.

3

AFFIRMED.