Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 872 FSUPP 574 - Wainwright v. Norris

Wainwright v. Norris’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
January 1997
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Batson v. Kentucky · Irvin v. Dowd · Wainwright v. Witt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “did not serve any proper rebuttal purpose.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “At the time I questioned Mr. Wainwright about this booklet, I felt in my heart that he was a member of the Bloods and that's what I was trying to get out to challenge his testimony and other evidence that he was a Christian.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “No, that's some [Moorish] Science Temple of America [material] ... [from] a book called 101.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.