Turner v. Nelson’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
1 district · 17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently May 2022
1 district · 17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sampson v. Richins · Hardy v. Hardy · Arnold v. Curtis · Bevan v. J.H. Construction Co. · BOARD OF ED. OF SOUTH SANPETE, ETC. v. Barton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We will not reverse the trial court{'s refusal to allow testimony] unless the appellant demonstrates that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and thereby affected the appellant's substantial rights.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“both parties the opportunity to prepare adequately for trial, including, among other things, deposing witnesses, investigating witnesses' testimony, and preparing an effective cross-examination”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“allow a party to call a surprise witness absent 'good cause' for the failure to disclose the witness as required by a court order or rule,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.