Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

872 So. 2d 447

McCluster v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2004-05-14

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2016

7 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-05-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the order of the trial court without prejudice to any right appellant might have to file a facially sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), or a timely facially sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, raising the claim that the written sentences in counts three and four are illegal because they do not comport with the oral pronouncement.

NORTHCUTT, KELLY and VILLANTI, JJ„ concur.
/872/so2d/447 · .json · Public domain