Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

872 S.W.2d 105

Rollins v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 1, 1994

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1994-02-01

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently August 2007

4 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1994-02-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Movant, Steven R. Rollins, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing.

¶3The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.

¶4The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

/872/sw2d/105 · .json · Public domain