Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 873 F.2d 1105 - Jackson v. Crews

Jackson v. Crews’s Empirical Analysis

873 F.2d 1105 · 1989

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
3
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 5 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently July 2016 · most notably Grant v. Martinez (1992), Cooper v. Casey (1996)

21 federal appellate · 5 district · 4 state decisions

1901989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · United States v. Sharpe · City of Riverside v. Rivera · Memphis Community School District v. Stachura · Richard Guzman and Mary Ann Guzman v. The Western State Bank of Devils Lake, a North Dakota Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “showfing] how the witness learned of the case and came to testify”). Defendants also contend that Stewart’s statement that she mailed the six-page treatment, the 45-page instrument and the 47-page manuscript is an attempt to prove the contents of the mailing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “determining the amount of force necessary to effect the arrest of [the plaintiff.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “personal humiliation, and mental anguish and suffering.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.