Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 873 F.2d 129 - Marsh v. Richardson

Marsh v. Richardson’s Empirical Analysis

873 F.2d 129 · 1989

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
July 2015
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently July 2015 · most notably Baker v. Raulie (1989), Pontarelli v. Stone (1991)

29 federal appellate · 4 district ·

2501989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Richardson v. Marsh · Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co. · Brody v. Guercio · Alaska Limestone Corp. v. Hodel · Consolidated Freightways Corp. v. Larson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'strict' and can be met only in extraordinary cases.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]t is well settled that leave to file an untimely notice of appeal is to be granted only in unique or extraordinary circumstances.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Most trial lawyers know that meeting time deadlines is a part of what their practice is all about.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.