Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 873 F.2d 136 - Disher v. Information Resources, Inc.

Disher v. Information Resources, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

873 F.2d 136 · 1989

Citation profile

95
cited by 95 later decisions
August 2024
most recently cited

58 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 95 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably McGuckin v. Smith (1992), First Nationwide Bank v. Gelt Funding Corp. (1994)

58 federal appellate · 2 district ·

48019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States · Carnegie-Mellon University v. Cohill · Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. Roper · Stoll v. Gottlieb

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an order that ends litigation in one dispute-resolution system is final and appealable even though it kicks off litigation in another.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A decision to relinquish pendent jurisdiction before the federal claims have been tried is, as we have said, the norm, not the exception, and such a decision will be reversed only in extraordinary circumstances.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “We are reluctant to opine unnecessarily on questions of state law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.