Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

873 F.2d 1439

Docket No. 89-6001.

James Byrd Miller v. Rosetta E. Harrison

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted March 9, 1989. Decided April 17, 1989. Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied May 22, 1989.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1989-05-22

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Malcolm v. Jones B

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1989-05-22

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

James B. Miller, appellant pro se.

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

James Byrd Miller appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate* discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Miller v. Harrison, C/A No. 88-1095-WS (M.D.N.C. Dec. 23, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

*

Miller's reason for failing to object to the magistrate's report may be grounds to excuse his default, but nevertheless, we note that the appeal is wholly without foundation and the magistrate's report is fully supported by the record

/873/f2d/1439 · .json · Public domain