Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 873 F.2d 31 - Yalkut v. Gemignani

Yalkut v. Gemignani’s Empirical Analysis

873 F.2d 31 · 1989

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
September 2016
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently September 2016 · most notably Al-Jundi v. Estate of Rockefeller (1989), Arbour v. Jenkins (1990)

22 federal appellate · 5 district ·

3401989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6331 · 26 U.S.C. § 6502 · 26 U.S.C. § 6532 · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Anderson v. Creighton · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Nixon v. Fitzgerald

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Gjovernment officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Congress specifically provided that the Reform Act was to apply to suits pending at the time of its enactment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “not dependent on disputed factual issues”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.