Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 873 F.2d 604 - Owens v. Treder

Owens v. Treder’s Empirical Analysis

873 F.2d 604 · 1989

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Kulak v. City of New York (1996), Dowling v. Finley Associates, Inc. (1999)

12 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

21019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Jackson v. Denno · Allen v. McCurry · Michigan v. Long · Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education · Caldwell v. Mississippi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under New York law, the doctrine of issue preclusion only applies if (1) the issue in question was actually and necessarily decided in a prior proceeding, and (2) the party against whom the doctrine is asserted had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the first proceeding.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Principles of collateral estoppel may bar relitigation in a subsequent civil rights action in federal court of an issue that was determined in a state court criminal proceeding. The federal court must, however, apply the collateral estoppel rules of the state which rendered the judgment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[F]ederal court[s] must ... apply the collateral estoppel rules of the state which rendered the judgment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.