Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 873 F.2d 765 - United States v. Burch

United States v. Burch’s Empirical Analysis

873 F.2d 765 · 1989

Citation profile

75
cited by 75 later decisions
October 2013
most recently cited

69 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently October 2013 · most notably United States v. Lara-Velasquez (1990), United States v. Osborne (1991)

69 federal appellate ·

6501989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 994

Relies on Williams v. People of State of New York · United States v. Mejia-Orosco · United States v. Lopez · United States v. Velasquez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'The method by which the district court chooses to address the requirements of Rule 32(c) and guideline 6A1.3(b) in a given case is for that court to select. As the guidelines direct, "[t]he sentencing court must determine the appropriate procedure in light of the nature of the dispute, its relevance to the sentencing determination, and applicable case law.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “not adequately taken into consideration by the Sentencing Commission in formulating the guidelines.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “sentencing is to be based on the crime committed, not the offender.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.