Grogan v. Kumar’s Empirical Analysis
873 F.3d 273 · 2017
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1746 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E
Relies on Estelle v. Gamble · Farmer v. Brennan · Schlagenhauf v. Holder · Skotak v. Tenneco Resins, Inc. · Geiger v. Jowers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“not able to eat, drink, [or] walk, and barely able to talk”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Arenas v. Calhoun
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.