Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 873 F.3d 763 - Gonzalez v. Sherman

Gonzalez v. Sherman’s Empirical Analysis

873 F.3d 763 · 2017

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
April 2024
most recently cited

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently April 2024

8020172020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Wilkinson Director Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al. v. Dotson et al. · Berman v. United States · Panetti v. Quarterman · Magwood v. Patterson · Burton v. Stewart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “which does constitute a new judgment. Id. at 769 . In so holding, we relied on-and limited our holding to-California law. Id. California requires prison officials to subtract a defendant's time served from the number of days to which the defendant would have otherwise been sentenced. Cal. Penal Code § 2900.5 (a). Therefore, when an amended judgment awards a prisoner credit for time served, it affects”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A scrivener's error occurs when there is a discrepancy between the court's oral pronouncement of the judgment and the written record of that judgment in the minute order or in the abstract of judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “remove[s] an invalid basis for incarcerating [the defendant], and provide[s] a new and valid intervening judgment to which”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.