Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 873 F.3d 817 - Morales v. Fry

Morales v. Fry’s Empirical Analysis

873 F.3d 817 · 2017

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Graham v. Connor · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Pearson v. Callahan · Duncan v. Walker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] bifurcation of duties is unavoidable: only the jury can decide the disputed factual issues, while only the judge can decide whether the right was clearly established once the factual issues are resolved.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “balance[s] two important, competing interests: the need to hold public officials accountable for irresponsible actions, and the need to shield them from liability when they make reasonable mistakes.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'clearly established' inquiry is a question of law that only a judge can decide.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.