Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 873 F.3d 896 - Corning v. Fast Felt Corp.

Corning v. Fast Felt Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

873 F.3d 896 · 2017

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
May 2025
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 35 U.S.C. § 103

Relies on KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. · Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. Lee · SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp. · In re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC · Belden Inc. v. Berk-Tek LLC

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there is only one permissible factual finding,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.